Question Thread for Danielle

[Indianman]

one lady became my friend thru angelreturn dot com. she yet to establish herself is a scammer she became my friend,she demanded she is danielle delaunay without informing her i became member of this forum because she react very opposite when i ask her to open this site and want to become your fan. so my question is are you really now in ghana for photo shooting an you have yahoo messenger id?

[danielle_ftv]

Originally Posted by Indianman

one lady became my friend thru angelreturn dot com. she yet to establish herself is a scammer she became my friend,she demanded she is danielle delaunay without informing her i became member of this forum because she react very opposite when i ask her to open this site and want to become your fan. so my question is are you really now in ghana for photo shooting an you have yahoo messenger id?

I am not in Ghana...nor have I ever been there. I also don't have a Yahoo messenger ID. You have been scammed my friend.

[RonTheLogician]

Originally Posted by danielle_ftv

I am not in Ghana...nor have I ever been there. I also don't have a Yahoo messenger ID. You have been scammed my friend.

Hey Dani,

The biggest headache facing you as a media producer in today's world is copyright violation by individual consumers (and potential combines of same). Let's not rehash this old problem.

But above we see an example of a different important problem - the ease with which existing practices allow nefarious commercal entities to usurp your identity, diverting customer income away from you, and diminishing your brand reputation as well. You probably know about the million-dollar judgement which FTV won in Nevada during late 2011 against an infringing competitor. Alas, I fear your operation is so small that discovering and litigating against a foe like that is all but impossible for you.

Yet it would not take a huge amount of effort to re-arrange things so that the would-be customers of people in your position could be reliably protected against scams, at the cost of only a minimal amount of education and diligence to them, and a bit of money to their providers.

When non-trivial e-commerce emerged in the 1990's, I was never afraid to save significant money by buying from small retailers in far-away places within the US about which I had never previously heard - because I always did my homework first! The Internet let me verify that the Secretary of State in its federal state venue knew of its existence, and how long. It also let me see if the BBB had anything interesting to note about them.

And over time new Internet tools for protecting myself emerged. Third-party reputation engines collected consumer ratings and war stories about countless thousands of teeny e-commerce firms, and retail aggregators like eBay and Amazon did so in-house as well.

The bottom line is that, in all my years of online purchasing, only once have I ever had to use my decisive veto power as a credit card user to (successfully) repudiate (in a timely way, of course) an incompliant Internet purchase. Today, by and large, buying online is a consumer's paradise, as you know, you Amazon addict! (Um... forgetting about stolen credit cards given the stupid low-tech system the US is still using today...)

Unfortunately, that is not always true for some online industries, like yours. The problem is that commercial activity is so limited for many firms that they fly under the radar of the aforementioned auditors.

I think now that your industry has matured, it is time to create an organization at least a little like SAG-AFTRA to protect erotic entertainers. It could help with vocational education, as well as looking out for important health, safety and legal issues. This includes the issue at hand, protecting your stage identity against theft. Of course it would be not a litte ironic were SAG-AFTRA itself to do so, given that former US Attorney General Edward Meese's boss was once this group's president!

Perhaps the AVN/AEE congolmerate might serve as a reasonably trustworthy agent for helping to defend industry producers and players - and their customers - against scams based on the theft of identity, by serving as a reliable, central registrar. Might a wealthy and potentially grateful beneficiency of the industry - like your old boss Rob - be kind enough to make some time to lobby for something like this - and earn the gratitude of the industry's people?

It would work this way. An industry participant - firm, player, agent or whatever could, for a reasonable fee, register with said registrar by reliably proving identity and receiving credentials which let that party subsequently inform the registrar of the vehicles that party will use for interacting with the public, including Internet media like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Blogger, Tumblr, Youtube, Pinterest, or whatever-the-heck next - for publication on the registrar's well-known web site. Payment of a reasonable annual fee could fund the reliable stewardship of the maintenance and update effort, including a budget for marketing this free service to consumers. An important aspect of this service would be that the actual identity and other personal details of industry particpants could be shielded from the general public, something which is often desirable, given the historic hatred and even persecution suffered by the industry and its workers. Such shielding is much more problematic, to say the least, were common vehicles like Secretary of State records and those of the Net's Domain Name System exploited for similar ends.

In closing, I'll mention that I recently learned something about protecting anonymity which might well be of great interest to you. I will describe it in a Private Message on this web site I hope you'll take the time in your busy schedule to read.

Best,
RtL

[RonTheLogician]

Hey Dani,

I'm curious what education you had for your current vocation. Was FTV Rob helpful in this regard, or were you an auto-didact, considering that you are a voracious bookworm?

As my previous post stated, I really think that the general availability of more formal training of, and advice to, porn players is called for, given how large and mature the industry is. But somehow, this isn't something I see conventional theatre programs embracing soon, notwithstanding the existence of porn scholarship, such as at ASU. Sigh. Perhaps with more formal training, you coud have obviated the conflict you recently told us about concerning your talent agent and a former contract firm.

Have you ever seen the video-based program known as Porn 101 and Porn 102, produced by Sharon Mitchell's now-defunct Adult Industry Medical Health Care Foundation (AIMHCF)? The demise of AIMHCF - not to mention the database breach which tragically spilled the real personal identity of so many porn players - is much to be regretted.

I recently learned that about a year ago, Julie Meadows, a retired award-winning veteran of 239 adult films, partly reviewed these two titles, in two lengthy posts of her blog, here and here. With AIMHCF gone, it's great that their distribution has survived its destruction, as part of a 4-DVD how-to product released in 2008 and titled Breaking Into Porn. (Your sometime co-star Tommy Gunn is among those who took part in the overall project.) Amazon sells the package here and another firm leases streaming access online here. If you ever watch Porn 101 and Porn 102, your review of them would make for an interesting vlog epsiode!

[Anoree]

You might have answered some of this in a video clip already with a sentence or two, but maybe you want to elaborate.

How does it feel to get fisted, vaginally and anally? Or even both together (at least attempted)?

How does it feel to get / have these long double headed dildos all inside of your bowels?

And as result of today's tweet, how does it feel to get double penetrated vaginally?

p.s.: I think it's a bit unfair: A guy never gets the chance to penetrate two vaginas at once.

[Index-of-Beauty Ben]

Anoree - you read my mind. I'm amazed at some of the things that your body allows you to do. So please elaborate. You have a captivated audience.

[danielle_ftv]

Great questions you guys! I have July's vlogs shot already so I will be answering the questions in August.

[RonTheLogician]

Originally Posted by Anoree

...p.s.: I think it's a bit unfair: A guy never gets the chance to penetrate two vaginas at once.

Gosh, Anoree! That's why modern science has formulated Peniplus, as mentioned above in the posting titled Profound penile progress, which points to the relevant brief video here.

Changing subjects, I've now had the chance to watch Dani's 26th birthday videolog. I was deeply impressed by how much you care for our birthday girl! Not only were you very financially generous to buy her so many gifts, but you were also extremely thoughtful to get her stuff that would either delight her, or help her vocation, or both. We know that Teresa (spelling?) is Dani's Best Friend, but surely you qualify as her Best Friend With One Penis!!!

I share Dani's excitement that you've equipped her with the rough-and-tumble-friendly GoPro camera and multiple accessories. (I am among those who've lobbied for the use of multiple camera shoots and novel mounting schemes, like the Virtual IsisCam.) Surely lots of interesting footage can now be shot in the months to come.

I don't mean to be a wet blanket, but I am curious, Anoree. Did you consider exploiting the alternative of Sony's Action Camera products, and if so, what tipped the balance in favor of the GoPro? A fascinating 2013 Forbes story here details how the GoPro pioneered this consumer product category. But it also suggests that Sony is a real competitor, introducing a feature like image stabilization. (Perhaps the fact that GoPro, Inc. was formerly named Woodman Labs, Inc. [cf. "wood"-man labias] is germane when considering application to the porn industry, LOL!)

I hope Danny notices that these camera makers also make available (free?) phone and tablet apps, which allows use of said gadgets in place of the dedicated WiFi remote. A couple years ago (surely no longer?) the WiFi remote required a non-trivial firmware upgrade before use. Should there be any remaining technical issues with the GoPro gear, I assume Dani is welcome to Skype you for tech support? (Psst, Dani: You can play dumb!)

Do allow me to gild the lily in the matter of multiple camera shoots. Please remember that while a live television director can only switch between (or split-screen) isochronous feeds from the cameras, post-production allows one much more freedom with an edited product. For example, you can show the same time span multiple times from the perspectives of more than one camera, as well as play tricks like slowing footage down (or even reversing it, e.g. for comical effect). Any serious editing software should make this doable.

If work with the GoPro turns out to be useful, Dani might add additional GoPro-family items to her Amazon WishList. One could even consider stuff like a QuadCopter or deer stand for overhead shots, or track-based model car "racing" kits for simpler tracking shots.

And heck, maybe one day you guys will even buy into the ChromaKey screen notion after all!

Perhaps Dani will find the following video clip inspiring as she looks to use a small wireless camera in imaginative ways. At the end of 2006, Britain's Channel Five broadcast a breakthrough multipart educational series called A Girl's Guide to 21st Century Sex. While the producers had to use wired cameras, they shot some types of footage never seen before on television. Perhaps the most spectacular was that of penis-vagina sex, including orgasm, from the visual perspective ofthe cervix, which one can review here. Funny but true fact: The series was hosted by a physician named Catherine Hood - that's right - Doctor "Kitty" Hood!

[Anoree]

Umm, Ron, the video link above tries to get me to download ("update") some unknown video player - no, no.

To answer your questions, yes, I try to balance my gifts between useful privately, useful for shooting and simply pleasuring Danielle. I get a lot of joy out of seeing Danielle's reactions.

I chose the GoPro simply because Danielle had it on her Amazon Wishlist. I should have known better and dig a bit into the product before purchasing it, because Danielle had a slightly outdated version on that wishlist. A couple of add-ons that I bought would have been built in in a newer and actually cheaper product. I think those apps you mentioned only work with GoPro 2 and newer, not the original one.

Of course Danielle can rely on me for ANY help I can give, whether it be over Skype, phone (I'd gladly pay the call) or any other media. Unfortunately she hasn't picked up on my repeated offers yet, but I don't want to get on her nerves with it. I'm sure she knows I'd be glad to help 24/7.

Some of the shots you mentioned would require a lot of preparation work and special equipment that isn't really wide spread. The internal shots of the orgasm would require a VERY small camera (or an endoscope), lighting and I think some air trapped in the "vajayjay" to clear the view area, for example.

One other point for future shoots that came to my mind is 3D shooting. (I admit it came to my mind again after my recent purchase of a 3D TV. ) Wouldn't it be cool to see our gorgeous host in three dimensions, even if it were "only" in a couple of candid scenes?

Did I mention that I love the candid videos and photos?